Talk:Pan American Games sports/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Unionhawk (talk · contribs) 18:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Introduction
Hello, I'm Unionhawk, and I will be reviewing the article in question, Pan American Games sports. I assume you all know how the GA nomination process works, so, let's get started.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 18:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

GA Criteria
A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Well-written

 * (a) Okay - I see some minor copyediting issues, but nothing I can't fix myself under WP:IAR.
 * (b) Good - lead covers what it needs to cover, layout is good, etc.

Factually accurate and verifiable

 * (a) Good - references are correct per MOS:LAYOUT
 * (b) Good - inline citations to reliable sources are used where needed
 * (c) Good - there is no original research

Broad in its coverage

 * (a) Not good - I'm reading the Pan American Games article, and they mention there that there were winter events at the Pan American Games. This article includes other discontinued events, but makes no mention of winter events. Now Good.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 16:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment it has been fixed. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions   16:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * (b) Good - article goes into detail where it needs to go into detail

Neutral

 * Good - article meets neutrality requirements.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 16:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Stable

 * Good - Article doesn't change very much from day to day, no edit wars.

Illustrated, if possible, by images

 * (a) Good - All images are properly tagged for copyright status.
 * (b) Good - All images are relevant, and have an appropriate caption

Conclusion
Having reviewed the article and compared it to the Good Article criteria, it is my conclusion that the article should be promoted to Good Article status.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 17:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)