Talk:Pancho Campo

Please stop removing content
Sigmahardware, please stop removing most of the content from this page, particularly as you have no references for doing so. C628 (talk) 00:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Reasons for change the information about Pancho Campo
The information about Pancho Campo contains some mistakes related to his career. It can lead readers and users of Wikipedia to a wrong impresion due to incomplete and inaccurate data —Preceding unsigned comment added by Media TWA (talk • contribs) 15:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)  — Media TWA (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Then be bold and fix it yourself. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Why we need to change this article
The information about Pancho Campo is not totally correct. Besides that, his bio refers to a judicial case that is plenty fatal errors committed during the judgment process. He was never informed of such court hearing because he was already living in Spain and that is the reason why he was declared absconding. Not to mention the Interpol issue, which violates his right to the presumption of innocence and damages his worthiness.

It seems there are hundreds of cases such as this in Dubai that are constantly being exposed by British and American media about people who carried out business in this part of the world and have been issued Interpol notices. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigmahardware (talk • contribs) 10:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If you could provide references from reliable sources for your claims, then that information could be added to the article. Until then, however, the policy on biographies of living people, which this article falls into, doesn't allow your claims to be published. C628 (talk) 11:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Few references about Pancho
http://www.planetavino.com/personajes/detalle.asp?id=7 http://www.climatechangeandwine.com/eng/seminarios.php http://www.winesofchile.org/countries/europe-news/down-to-earth-prowein/ http://www.down2earth-prowein.com/index.php?page_id=8

In this links, you can read information about Pancho, about how work for the comunity, and about he always was in touch with the world.

Please, try to help us.

Thanks very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigmahardware (talk • contribs) 16:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, in my opinion only one of the above links appears to resemble a reliable source (RS), the planetavino.com article, and as it is written in Spanish, it isn't readily available for citation, at least for those whose Spanish is as insufficient as mine. The other links lead to self-published promotional sites, which are not considered RS. At any rate, these links supply information that is available elsewhere and that is already (briefly) covered in the article, none of which is contentious information. Your problem, however, appears to be with the statements you have repeatedly deleted that are referenced from articles in Decanter and the Abu Dhabi newspaper The National, objective and in no way mean-spirited reporting. The fact is that these RS articles are published (and there to be found by anyone who googles), and until follow-ups address the issues, this is not information you may remove at will because you disagree with the content. However, if and when a RS publishes a report that refutes the allegations, we will gladly make the adjustments, but until then this article will reflect reports found in the free press. M URGH   disc.  23:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Please, help us
Hi.

Wich kind of document do you need for remove this information? Is true that is in the I.P. webpage, but also is true that no countries have any problem with Mr. Campo.

We just want to know, how to work with you.

Thanks very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigmahardware (talk • contribs) 12:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * To be able to remove the information pertaining to Campo's issues with the law, you would have to provide a reliable source, such as an article from a reputable news organization such as the New York Times or BBC. In fact, since the references currently in the article are regarded as reliable, they would be good examples.  What would not work as a reliable source, however, are blogs, press releases, or promotional materials.  A general rule of thumb is that if your source has a noticeable bias, it's generally not suitable as a source.  An example of what would not be a reliable source is one of the ones you provided above, the Wines of Chile one.  It has a distinctly promotional tone, and is written for the purpose of advertising a specific event.  If you can come up with a suitable source for your claims, than they can be added to the article as an addition to the paragraph on those events, but not as a substitute, as the information currently in place is just as valid  Until then, however, I'm afraid that the article can't be changed one way or another.  Please feel free tom ask for clarification on my explanation here. Thank you, C628 (talk) 17:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops. I've contradicted myself. To make it clear: You can add information about whatever you want pertaining to Campo in the article, but nothing can be removed, since everything in there is currently adequately cited and not in violation of neutral point of view or the policies pertaining to biographies of living people. C628 (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC)