Talk:Papakating Creek

Notability
Per WP:OUTCOMES, specifically WP:OUTCOMES "Major geographical features such as lakes, rivers, mountains, etc., are acceptable". The USGS thinks Papakating Creek is notable enough to have a stream gauge on it. I fail to see how this merits a speedy delete Ruhrfisch  &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 01:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Bad judgment on my part, sorry. I've read WP:CSD and WP:OUTCOMES plenty of times, but I mistakenly thought that this was a very small body of water with no real significance. More specifically, I thought it was just a few miles long based on this. I'll be sure to work on my map reading skills. :-) — xDanielx  T/C\R 09:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Papakating Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150630110449/http://www.epa.gov/waters/tmdldocs/Papakating%20TMDL%20-%20established.pdf to http://www.epa.gov/waters/tmdldocs/Papakating%20TMDL%20-%20established.pdf
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)