Talk:Papaverhof

Proposed merge with Papaverhof
Both articles are about the same subject Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Sounds logical to me. I only created the other one because this one got rejected at AfC. Nice to see them reverse the rejection! Jane (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Jane, for future reference, please don't ever do that again. A Decline (Not Rejection) at AfC is almost never a permanent refusal, a decline is actually the way AfC points out a problem and helps the article writer fix it. Reviews are repeated until the article is acceptable. In this case it was actually an error by the reviewer, which I corrected, but the principle still stands. Your creation of the stub has made the process more complicated, but don't worry, it's completely fixable. We just need an admin to perform a history merge of the two articles. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I just responded to a cry for help on the Wikiproject Netherlands page and was surprised (and saddened) to see the notice on the contributor's page. Glad to see I don't need to worry about this ever again! Jane (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please do a WP:History merge of Papaverhof and Papaverhof complex, the merged page title should be "Papaverhof", thanks. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll have a go...  Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All done  Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * It appears that you inadvertently deleted my stub along with everything in it when you merged - hope you can fix this. Jane (talk) 09:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)