Talk:Paper Mario/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

it fails on 3)a):"it addresses the main aspects of the topic" in the Good Article criteria in the Development section: just look at it! It's only two sentences and has no citations!-SCB &#39;92 (talk) 15:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I restored the section back to what it was before. An IP user deleted it back in February with this edit. However, I believe that this GAR should continue as the Plot and Setting section seems to fail 3a as there are parts of the plot missing. GamerPro64  17:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * While I agree that it is not to the ideal standards of a Good Article, I must strongly suggest to SCB to please stop. You have nominated several articles for various things, including GAN, without putting the proper work in to ensure that it fulfills the criteria. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 10:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay, now the development section is good again, I won't delist the article; but the vandalism should've been reverted-SCB &#39;92 (talk) 14:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)