Talk:Paper hanger (Mundelein's speech)

POV
The article's tone seems slightly POV in favor of Hitler. Perhaps this was an overzealous attempt to prevent POV in the other direction, but regardless this is a problem and someone with more knowledge on this speech should rewrite the article. --Israelite9191 18:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I did not hear anything postive or negative...but the term paper hanger speaks more about the endorsed elitist ideas of the time..that calling someone a working class person was considered a put down..and actually..from what I have read about hitler..he likely never did that kind of work..he looked down on hard physical work as much as the good father. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.46.89 (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The point was, what qualifications did he have to rule a country? -- AnonMoos (talk) 22:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * No, I have to agree with the earlier commenter, that it's definitely defensive of Der Fuehrer. That he was a "published author" isn't much of an accolade, given that Mein Kampf is more a rant than any sort of honest intellectual work. And sure, he was a "watercolorist." So is my sister; her pieces are very nice. I doubt they would offset her desire for racial cleansing and world conquest, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpolhemus (talk • contribs) 15:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)