Talk:Papilio indra


 * Re: bonnevillensis. If this taxon has not been described as is stated, then the name given would appear to be a nomen nudum, and certainly Pelham's catalogue makes no mention of it. Consequently, it has no place here. I think it would be better to remove it as a ssp. name and make reference to it in the text. This is what I have done. Glacierman (talk) 21:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Re: parvindra. This taxon was erroneously published as a relacement name for pygmaeus, which in fact was not in need of replacement; pygmaeus was properly described. This reversion can be found in the current Pelham's catalogue. I have therefore changed the entry to reflect that. Glacierman (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)