Talk:Papoose Peak Jumps/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 15:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I will review this article! MathewTownsend (talk) 15:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
 * I made a few edits to improve the prose which you're free to change.
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * No images
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * No images
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * No images
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * No images
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass