Talk:Pappas v. Giuliani

NYCLU = RS?
As much as I support and appreciate the work of civil liberties-defending groups like the New York Civil Liberties Union, I'm not sure it should be considered a reliable source in the context of describing a court ruling. (I have no reason to believe the particular information cited here is skewed or untrustworthy; it is on general principle that I raise the question.)

I see nothing in WP:RS about advocacy organizations, but my understanding is that their work should be referenced only to illuminate the organization itself, or when no other information about a subject is available (and then accompanied by an indication that the reader is consuming the perspective of an advocacy organization). Thoughts, other folks? Scartol •  Tok  15:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Pappas v. Giuliani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090519162319/http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayors-appellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/ to http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayors-appellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 04:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)