Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 153

Suitable for WikiProject Equine?
It may be a stretch to include this article (which only tangentially involves horses, as the articles of purchase) in the equine project.--Miniapolis (talk) 16:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Feel free to take it out. I just thought that it might be interesting to people interested in horses.  Not a big issue for me either way.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * When you put it that way, who knows? You may be right, so it's fine with me if it stays in all four projects.--Miniapolis (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Manuscripts that tangentially mention horses are not really within WP Equine's scope. If we tagged every article that mentioned horses or stables, we would have half of the articles on wiki in our scope :) Dana boomer (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)