Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 17:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Will start soon. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  17:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Criteria
GA Criteria:
 * 1
 * 1.a ✅
 * 1.b ✅
 * 2
 * 2.a ✅ (All references are either self-contained or have bibliography.)
 * 2.b ✅
 * 2.c ✅
 * 2.d ✅ (Highest is 9.9, due to name of source, and incidental phrases.)
 * 3
 * 3.a ✅
 * 3.b ✅
 * 4
 * 4.a ✅
 * 5
 * 5.a ✅
 * 6
 * 6.a ✅
 * 6.b ✅
 * No DAB links ✅
 * No Dead links ✅
 * Images appropriately licensed ✅

Prose Suggestions

 * although the beginning has since been lost. Does this mean the beginning was lost before the Papyrus was found? If so, I suggest a change to although the beginning of the papyrus was lost before it was found.
 * It is the only of the Oxyrhynchus Papyri presently held in the university's collection suggest It is the only Oxyrhynchus Papyri currently held by the university's collection.
 * if not already orphaned or discarded does discarded here mean left to die? If so I would recommend you specify that.
 * If this stipulation was transgressed, the typical punishment was confiscation of private property. to what extent? Would the slave be taken? Would a certain value worth of property be taken?
 * Financial declaration of slaving sales should this be slave sales, or does source use slaving sales?
 * That is all my comments. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  19:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Done; thanks so much for your comments. Curlymanjaro (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)