Talk:Para-Scientology

Notable
The article starts out by saying Para-Scientology is a branch of Scientology. This does not seem to be supported by the article. It seems to be just an expression that Hubbard used sometimes. This also seems to be the opinion of critics. Steve Dufour 12:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Para-Scientology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060112193301/http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/kent-fake-religion.htm to http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/kent-fake-religion.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061211201637/http://reportingtimes.com/viewarticle.asp?iArticleID=426 to http://www.reportingtimes.com/viewarticle.asp?iArticleID=426

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Not notable
I don't think this is a subject, though maybe a definition Hubbard said a time or two. Things Hubbard theorized, he would later mention as fact, and incorporate them into the body of Scientology.... but not this. He also like making up new terms, some of which were shortly discarded. There are three definitions in his tech dictionary, from the mid-1950s. Nothing since then. This could be a paragraph in the Glossary of Scientology with a redirect from here, but this is obscure enough that it will never pass notability requirements for a standalone page in Wikipedia. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 04:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)