Talk:Parable of the barren fig tree

Interpretation makes no sense
The current Interpretation section claims that both the owner and the gardener represent God. How can that be?


 * ″the owner is generally regarded as representing God″
 * ″The gardener (vinedresser) is God″

173.29.241.219 (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * One way to resolve this conflict is to view the conversation between the owner and the gardener as one between the first and second persons of the Christian trinity: Father and Son. James.Wetzstein (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)