Talk:Paradise (1982 film)/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Paradise cover VHS.JPG
Image:Paradise cover VHS.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Screenshot
The image File:PhoebeWillieParadise1982.JPG does not have a sufficient fair use rationale to be in the article. Non-free images need to be able to illustrate critical commentary about the film. Please see File:American Beauty jail cell.png and File:Changeling closing sequence.png to understand how explicit the rationale needs to be. Showing two actors from the film is not critical commentary. Erik (talk) 18:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not actually a screenshot, it's a publicity still, if that matters. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right; I corrected the licensing. Still, since it is non-free and is just used to "show" the characters, it's not a good enough rationale.  There's barely any commentary in the article to work with; it would need to be expanded to have content for which non-free images could support. Erik (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If there is not going to be any discussion rationalizing the production still, I will be removing it tomorrow. Erik (talk) 11:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * What needs to be added? Production notes? Cast selection? I see a section was added. Rivertown (talk) 21:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)