Talk:Paradise Lost (Symphony X album)

Concept Album?
In this interview ( http://www.metal-temple.com/interview.asp?id=362 ) with the lead singer, he specifically states this is not a concept album.

" So,"Paradise Lost" is not a concept album.

No, it isn’t. It’s like "The Dark Side Of The Moon" by Pink Floyd; it is not a story but it deals with life and death and things in between. The new album deals with feelings about what’s going on like love, betrayal, lost and revenge. Vanity is a big thing in the first few songs. The parallel to the book with Satan as a character is about all these feeling that he has. In the videos we did the director wanted to go in a more literal way which is fine with us because it is more impressive."


 * That's interesting. I thought that this album had to be a concept album. Well, that explanation sure makes sense. It's not a concept album, but it has reoccuring themes, I guess. Backtable 71792 c 11:40 17 September 2007(Eastern Time)


 * As far as Í know, a concept album doesn't necessarily néed to focus on any story at all (that's called a rock opera). Instead, concept albums are focussed on... well, a concept.. meaning a recurring theme, setting, character, feeling or anything like that. And in that way (whether or not Russel says it's not), it would still be a genuine concept album. Cyanid (talk) 19:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmm, that's a good way to look at the album. Yeah, it does have a few characterstics of a concept album. You have a good point there. B T C 19:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've now changed the page back to the category of Concept Albums. I looked on the wikipedia-page for Concept album and the first line already says: "In popular music, a concept album is an album which is "unified by a theme, which can be instrumental, compositional, narrative, or lyrical". ", which is exactly what Paradise Lost is. Cyanid (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * All right, thanks for that. B T C 23:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

The Accolade?
My version of "Revelation (Divus Pennea ex Tragoedia)" ends with a sequence from "The Divine Wings of Tragedy", rather than with a segment of "The Accolade".

145.99.195.193 08:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Um... the Accolade reference was put in there for comparison. I think you misinterpreted the sentence. = ∫ tc 5th Eye 23:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Lovecraft?
I don't get it. What does Lovecraft have to do with Paradise Lost? Is this MR quote accurate, or did he say John Milton? Petergee1 11:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Honestly this is an unreliable source, it probably should be removed all together unless the author can cite it sufficiently. John Milton is the one whom wrote Paradise Lost, however we can not be certain what he said so it would be unwise to change it. AH, I want new Symphony X. Peregrine 15:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

The bass player, Mike LePond, is a big fan of H. P. Lovecraft. I read on an interview with Romeo that he was going to try to incorporate it into the new album. http://www.churchofthemachine.com/MJRchatMar06.html "Mike L has been reading some Lovecraft, etc. so we have some ideas " "It looks like we will have a BIG tune on here - it is turning out that way now "


 * The album is out in Italy, 22 June, and judjing by the lyrics there's no Lovecraft refernces. I sugges to remove the comment, even if it has a reliable source. Cuttyflam 09:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

"Revelation"
any idea what the parenthetical note in Revelation's title is about? it looks like a poor translation of the phrase "Divine Wings of Tragedy", but literally means something more like "God of the wing, out of tragedy". is there some other meaning in there? Zxjams 04:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Probably not... it seems someone removed the sections stating that "Revelation" was a sequel of sorts of "The Divine Wings of Tragedy", hence the similar melodies in some parts and the Latin translation. = ∫tc 5th Eye 15:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

radio ads
Someone left the following sentence in the article: "Also going for metal radio adds on June 11/12, 2007." This needs to be elaborated on or at least rewritten to be grammatically correct. Kouban 20:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

60:66 As said in the booklet
In the infobox, it says that the album is 61:06. It also says beside it, in parenthesis, that it is 60:66 as said in the booklet. I own this album (and it's awesome, if you ask me) and I don't recall ever seeing the time lengths ov the songs, let alone the total time as 60:66. When I get home today (I'm at school now), I'm going to look through the Paradise Lost booklet and see whether this guy's claim is true that it says it's 60:66 in the booklet. B T C 11:09, 15 November 2007 (Eastern Standard Time)

60:66 As said in the booklet (Part 2)
I looked in the booklet for this album and that guy who said that it was depicted as 60:66 in the booklet is right. In case you don't know where it is, the total time thing ov 60:66 is on the final page ov the booklet in really small text below the fancy picture. So, that settles that event. B T C 20:38, 17 November 2007 (Eastern Standard Time)

Fair use rationale for Image:49630.jpg
Image:49630.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)