Talk:Paralia (Seleucid eparchy)

Unsourced information
just restored a bunch of unsourced (not to mention extremely tendentious) information to the article. Kindly either source it or remove it. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * All of it is sourced, albeit perhaps not inline. Please add where you consider an inline source is needed, and I will be glad to deliver. Oncenawhile (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but no. I looked at the source you use inline and it does not use the terminology you use in the article. Per WP:V I may remove it immediately, which I will do soon if you do not include a source explicitly using the same terminology in the same context, or in other words without falling afoul of SYNTH.
 * The same goes for the maps. They have the exact same caption in every article they appear except this one. Either source your captions, use the ones that appear in the other articles, or remove the maps. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I removed the unsourced tendentious terminology again. I also removed the maps since their captions were OR and with the proper captions like they have everywhere else they are not relevant here. Restoring this again without proper sourcing will result in a report on one of the admin boards. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 01:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The naming is simply incorrect - the Paralia eparchy according to the source was a Seleucid eparchy (not "Palestine" eparchy). We should thus rename it to Paralia (Seleucid eparchy) in line with Judea (Roman province), Syria (Roman Province) and Yehud (Babylonian province).GreyShark (dibra) 16:09, 15 July 2016 (UTC)