Talk:Paramatman

Untitled
Does the Rigveda really mention paramatman? Mitsube (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Advaita & Paramatman
If the Jivatman and the Paramatman are known to be one and the same than how can can the word "Paramatman" conjure the concept of God in a monotheistic sense ? does the monotheistic religions consider God & the individuals to be one & the same ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.1.130 (talk) 11:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm placing the controversial sentence on this page until some sort of resolution is reached to this now year-long (August 2009-August 2010) NPOV dispute. In my view, this sentence might be true but contains too many weasel words to be clear enough to remain on the page, namely, "invariably," which is not cited, "God in a monotheistic sense," as Brahman is not the Christian God, and Hinduism is not a monotheistic religion, and especially the phrasing of, "may be applied as epithets," which is not only vague but also does not fit with the rest of the page as it loses any distinction between any of the, "Gods worshiped by Hindus." Perhaps someone will come along to incorporate this idea somehow, later on. Here's the removed sentence,

"The word invariably conjures the concept of an infinite, non-corporeal God in a monotheistic sense, even though Bhagavan or Ishvara may be applied as epithets to many divine forms of God worshiped by Hindus." makeswell (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

"Paramatman in Buddhism": There is none as far as I know, and link does not mention paramatman, simply the anatta belief. The sentence under the heading appears to be an original thought by the author, an attempt to speculate what Buddhisms implies. Unless some link to Buddhism can be shown, the section should be removed. BD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.40.192 (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Paramatman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312211826/http://vedabase.net/bg/13/23/en to http://vedabase.net/bg/13/23/en
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312212902/http://vedabase.net/sb/7/14/38/en to http://vedabase.net/sb/7/14/38/en
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217121958/http://vedabase.net/sb/3/28/41/en to http://vedabase.net/sb/3/28/41/en
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123213949/http://vedabase.net/sb/1/2/23/en to http://vedabase.net/sb/1/2/23/en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)