Talk:Parbhani/Archive 1

The first citation, width
There is a line which is making the page very wide, I checked but I couldn't find any way to edit it.

There have been lots of edits as well. Most of these edits have been done by youngsters/teenagers from Parbhani itself. So it is very biased and from a point of a fan. We need to edit it. (Believe me, I am from Parbhani as well).

There were some attempts of advertising (in schools and colleges), I removed them.

Looking forward to see some work done on this page, Regards, Kiran :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usernamekiran (talk • contribs) 10:04, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Parbhani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120210052825/http://mkv2.mah.nic.in/doe/maufrgen.html to http://mkv2.mah.nic.in/doe/maufrgen.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Parbhani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imdpune.gov.in/Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Parbhani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imdpune.gov.in/Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100318055304/http://ceo.maharashtra.gov.in/acs.php to http://ceo.maharashtra.gov.in/acs.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Assessed article as B class
Hello,

I've just re-assessed the article, and bumped it to B class as I believe it meets all the criteria:


 * The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of tags and citation templates such as  is optional.
 * The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
 * The article has a defined structure.''' Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
 * The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
 * The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
 * The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.

If there are any doubts/queries regarding the assessment, kindly ping me here to discuss them. Regards, — usernamekiran (talk)  16:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)