Talk:Paris Saint-Germain F.C./GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sandman888 (talk) Latest FAC 13:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

My second GA review. I will place this on hold, as I feel this could be a GA with some work. A nicely-written article. All in all, I'll say that the lede is too long, history section is a bit short and there are some issues to iron out.

I've failed the article due to lack of response from otherwise active nominator. Sandman888 (talk) Latest PR 06:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


 * General
 * Colours. This is not often used in other football articles, I would recommend creating a spin-off article and remove all of the images, save perhaps one or two. Also needs references.
 * References.
 * This is very problematic. Many of the references are poorly formatted and needs date, accessdate, author if possible and publisher. I recommend you use the {cite web} template so you remember all the important information.
 * None of the cited books are being referenced in the article. This is a cause for some concern. Also some of the books seem to have self-translated titles, which is not acceptable. Include original title and add the "|language=French" parameter when using {cite book}.
 * Stadiums
 * Needs references, entire sections are unreffed.
 * Current squad
 * The "starting line-up" image caption is unreferenced, and I'll be surprised if you can find a source stating the first XI. Something seems to have gone wrong with the image.
 * Reserves and academy
 * Unreferenced sections
 * Managers
 * I would remove the list of managers and keep the wikilink to "List of managers".
 * Presidents
 * Again, would remove the list, or at least format it properly. Per MosFlag, the French flag should be removed.
 * Le classique
 * Two first sections are unreferenced.
 * Rivalries
 * Please, consider to add new emerging rivalry with Chelsea.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:718:1E03:AED2:619A:246E:D9FB:69F5 (talk) 09:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Honours
 * See WikiProject_Football/Clubs for the manual of style. Formatting should be quite different.
 * Images.
 * Often well-captioned, however there are some problems:
 * File:Coupe des Coupes 1996.jpg is a derivative, copyright belongs to trophy-manufacturer.
 * "Crest" section contains a gallery of non-free images, which is discouraged. One or two images should be enough to illustrate the evolution of the crest.
 * Lead.
 * Far too long I must say, see WP:LEAD for recommendation on the lead. Remember, lead = summary of article. I would recommend writing a new summary and stuff in the lead.