Talk:Parish of Yipunyah

Requested move 20 May 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Procedural close consensus was reached elsewhere. &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Yipunyah Parish → Parish of Yipunyah – Unable to move for some reason. Move as per WP:AWNB discussion to clean up huge mess in NSW parish articles. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 01:50, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:01, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ❌ The linked discussion is still mid-discussion and has not yet come to a consensus. &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It is completely unanimous as far as these moves are concerned. Now there's just one sitting at a completely different title from all of the others. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It is completely unanimous as far as these moves are concerned. Now there's just one sitting at a completely different title from all of the others. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Again, this series of moves has unanimous support at WP:AWNB after ten days and feedback from quite a few editors. As the only editor who seems to have an issue with it, perhaps would like to explain his opinions on the naming of cadastral divisions. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 04:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Support, this naming convention is sensible.--Grahame (talk) 13:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.