Talk:Parker Pen Company

2007
"the most prestigious and collectible in the world". There's POV, then there's the really-stretching-it-kind-of-POV. Cmon, you can buy this pen at Staples... with a coupon. The most prestigious? Would anybody throw a fit if I reworded this? -Taco325i 01:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that phrase is both Weaselly and NPOV. By all means please do. Fan-1967 02:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

External link
I've removed links to parkerpens.net and Parkercollector.com (note:different URLs, but same site) in the external links section a couple of times. The main reason I removed them was because they had been previously spammed across many different articles by (once even including both links to the same site). Additionally, the link was self-described as an unofficial fan-site, and, per WP:ELNO, these are to be avoided. I wanted to see what others thought about it. Thanks! Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  15:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Parker 51
Claiming that Parker 51 (in 1941) was made to macth Quink properties of dry (created in 1931) has no factual support, so I rephrased the paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsergio (talk • contribs) 19:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Merge proposal: Parker Vector to Parker Pen Company
Parker Vector doesn't seem to be independently notable, but would perhaps be worth a mention/redirect here. Boleyn (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Selling price of pen to manufacture
Whole seller and retailer 117.211.145.216 (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

"Parker 100" just links to this page
Under the "See also" section, there's an entry for the Parker 100, but that link just redirects to the same "See also" section. Should this be removed? JimboMcGrimbo (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)