Talk:Parks and Recreation season 3/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  03:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Curious, but other than the delay, was season 3 formally considered a shortened season? Wasn't NBC obliged to give them the standard 22 - 24 episode minimum?  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  06:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I imagine it's because the show got a late start, and came in mid-season rather than the start of the season, but I haven't seen any WP:RS that state this explicitly, nor any that flat-out call it a shortened season. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Awesome job! I couldn't imagine organizing the entire season into one article. Whew! And Pass!  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  08:14, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Parks and Recreation (season 3) passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: