Talk:Parliament of South Australia

The Sovereign/Governor as part of the parliament
My understanding is that The Sovereign/Governor although they have power in relation to the parliament, does not actually exist as part of the South Aussie Parliament, secion 4 of the South Aussie constitution specifies the parliament as the two houses, unlike the federal parliament where the queen IS part of the parliament (S1 of the Constitution) so i think the sections relating ot the sovereign need to be altered... Mikelake 05:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I think you might be right. Section 4 of the constitution says:
 * 4. There shall be a Legislative Council and a House of Assembly which shall be called the Parliament of South Australia, and shall be constituted in the manner provided by this Act.
 * and the idea of the Queen-in-Parliament is not used in Scotland, even by the Parliament at Westminster. I would say, though, that in effect the Govenor has similar powers to the Governor-General, so it makes little difference in reality.  Also, the governor has similar powers to a house of parliament in that a bill needs the governor's assent to become law and according to section 56:
 * 56. It shall be lawful for the Governor to transmit, by message, to the Council or Assembly, for their consideration, any amendment which the Governor desires to be made in any Bill presented to the Governor for assent, and all such amendments shall be taken into consideration, in such convenient manner, as is provided in that behalf by the standing rules and orders.
 * I would change it and make a note as to why it is different from the Commonwealth, unless anyone else has something to add in the next few days. --ThirdEdition 07:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Reorganising Australian parliaments category
I propose to tidy up Category:Australian Parliaments a little by creating a new sub category within it called - Category:Parliaments of the Australian States and Territories. This category would contain articles on the Parliaments but not lists of previous parliaments. The category would then be listed at Category:Legislatures of subnational entities in place of Category:Australian Parliaments. This would mean that this article will be listed under the new Category:Parliaments of the Australian States and Territories instead of the current Category:Australian Parliaments. If you would like to comment please go to Category talk:Australian parliaments Adz 07:51, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Remove stub tags
I think this article is more than just a stub now and the stub tags should be removed. Any objections? --ThirdEdition 04:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * None here. Mikelake 11:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

How Detailed
Im wondering how detailed to make this page, should this page conatain considerabely less than the main page of the two house, im thinking of thinks like the origins of the colors of the houses, the details about the clerks, seargeants/ushers, the significance of the mace and black rod etc etc can we put that here or just on the main page for the relevant house?? Mikelake 15:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I'd always thought that the details of each house would go on the houses pages and that this page would give an outline of all of the parliament issues and link to other articles. --ThirdEdition 00:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)