Talk:Parnassius imperator

Questionable accuracy
This article was originally about a subspecies. It was renamed as a species article, without any changes to the information previously about the subspecies, and that information persists as the primary information about the species. I think all of that information should be deleted, listed explicitly as referring only to a single subspecies, or have the information reverified and referenced with inline sources. I'm adding the "disputed" template to the article. --Agyle (talk) 14:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it's just a few sentences...I'm just going to delete them, and see if I can find a source for anything to replace it. --Agyle (talk) 14:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)