Talk:Parnell Commission

Untitled
Most of what I've written is fairly disjointed and mostly semi-plagirised from the wikipedia article on Parnell.GiollaUidir 16:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

The first paragraph of this article implies that it was an attempt on the part of the Parnell Judges themselves to descredit Parnell. This hardly seems likely - may I suggest that you change this wording?

Can we clarify which legal costs were paid by The Times?
The Wikipedia article on Pigott seems to imply that The Times, in addition to damages, agreed to pay Parnell's legal costs. The present article does not make this clear, and could be read as implying that The Times merely paid its own legal costs. (The article on Parnell mentions only the damages, not the costs). Could someone with better access to the sources please clarify this point. Thank you. Nandt1 (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)