Talk:Parody religion

Pastafarianism - not qualified of parody religion
Although many regard the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster as a parody religion, it is as valid as any other religions.

The many arguments in favour of the classification of Pastafarianism as a parody religion have been countermanded by equally good counterarguments.

Firstly, although the percentage of Pastafarians who actually believe the world was created by His Noodly Majesty is, at a guess, lower than that of Christians or Muslims who believe the world was created by their deity, it doesn't make it any less of a religion. Many members of other religions do not fully believe in all of their scripture, as some part of every holy book in history has been irrefutably proved to be nonsense, however they are still qualified of religions. As stated by Bobby Henderson himself: "Some claim that the church is purely a thought experiment or satire, illustrating that Intelligent Design is not science, just a pseudoscience manufactured by Christians to push Creationism into public schools. These people are mistaken — The Church of FSM is legit, and backed by hard science. Anything that comes across as humor or satire is purely concidential".

First-and-a-halfly, to complete the previous point, it is obvious that the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster takes a more relaxed approach to life, unlike other religions, which are extremely strict, and follow carefully detailed rites, where everything has to be solemn, and none can relax. That does not make Pastafarianism a "fake" or "illegitimate" religion - that just makes it a cooler religion.

Secondly, although it seems at first glance that a belief in the Flying Spaghetti Monster is ridiculous, once a good couple of steps back are taken, one may come to realize that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is not impossible, but very unlikely. After the taking of another good couple of steps back, one may come to further realize that the idea of an all-powerful god creating the world is equally very unlikely. The only difference is the length of time for which people have been known to believe in god, and the number of believers. Someone very clever whose name I can no longer remember said something along the lines of: "If we lived in a world of atheists, and there was only one person who believed in some sort of god, then that person would be locked up and put in a mental asylum. However, as there are many people who have been taught to believe in some sort of god from birth, belief in god is now an alternative to logical conjecture based on overwhelming observable evidence. So does the fact that many people believe in it make it any more likely to be true?" To which the answer, of course, is no. I am not debating that people are wrong to be religious here - I myself am a Pastafarian - I am just stating that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is as likely to exist as god, and that the only difference between the two is that one has been believed in for a longer time, and by a greater number of people. If Christianity, Islam and Judaism are recognised as "legit" religions, then so should Pastafarianism be.

Thirdly, it is wrong for people outside of a group to be able to label the group. The vast majority of (actually, almost all) Pastafarians are in favour of labelling the Church as a religion, whereas most of the votes against that are by non-Pastafarians, who have nothing to do with the Church. Pastafarians are the ones who actually know how their organization works better, so why prefer other people's labels of the groups, rather than letting Pastafarians decide for themselves what they want to be labelled as? If non-Pastafarians gain the right to label us as a "parody religion", then that is an invasion of our rights.

Fourthly, even if the previous argument is wrong, and it is perfectly OK for members outside of a group to be able to decide what the group is, which it is most likely not, Pastafarianism has been legally recognised in two countries, whose opinions are as valid as that of other countries. It is a recognised religion in many parts of the world, so Wikipedia (which is not based in any part of the world), if not recognising Pastafarianism as a religion, should, every time Pastafarianism is referred to as a "pseudo-religion" or "parody", mention that it is a religion as much as it is a parody, depending on which part of the world you are in.

Please discuss.

Thanks, RomBRNS — Preceding unsigned comment added by RomBRNS (talk • contribs) 13:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)) (UTC)


 * Please sign all your talk page messages with four tildes ( ~ ) — See Help:Using talk pages. Thanks.
 * The literature seems to disagree. Here's some relevant sources that classify pastafarianism as a parody religion:
 * {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center"

! Google !! Scholar !! Books
 * Pastafarianism "Parody religion"
 * 25
 * 39
 * }
 * - DVdm (talk) 13:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * }
 * - DVdm (talk) 13:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)


 * ... even if some countries might say that they recognise it as a religion (see user 's undo of my undo on article Flying Spaghetti Monster). So here we have something that is a religion and a parody religion. Indeed, one does not exclude the other . - DVdm (talk) 14:19, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Crabstianity
What is the threshold for notability? Crabstianity has been growing at a pretty good clip, with Jibbers being frequently referenced across the internet. See: https://theoatmeal.com/blog/jibbers_crabst — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.188.182 (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


 * If a topic is discussed in third-party publications with reasonable editorial oversight (in other words, not just a blogs and internet comments), that coverage is the evidence that there is appropriate visibility of the topic. To be clear, a mention is not enough; the source must explicitly support whatever is to be said about it, so for example, a source describing it as a meme would not qualify to describe it as a parody religion. At present, I am not aware of any such sources. BiologicalMe (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: CSCW
— Assignment last updated by Runnxr (talk) 01:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

The Parody religion of Haruhi Suzumiya
Haruhi fans have light-heartedly referred to themselves as followers of "Haruhiism", referencing the God-like status of Haruhi that Koizumi mentions in the original The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya light novel. Haruhiism is a mock religion, based on Koizumi's suggestion that an undefined phenomenon which happened three years prior to the start of the series was Haruhi destroying the universe and then creating the current universe according to her own design. Haruhi fans have jokingly claimed that Haruhi is the creator and destroyer of everything.

Could "Haruhiism" be considered for inclusion in the article? TreeElf (talk) 07:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)