Talk:Parque Warner Madrid

Edit
The edit at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parque_Warner_Madrid&diff=prev&oldid=254692886 seems to have introduced a machine-translated version of perhaps the Spanish version. Very poor quality. --Nricardo (talk) 03:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Poor quality/bias
"Endless Queues" and "Without food or water" don't seem to be very informative section titles. Could someone who knows how to work Wikipedia (I'm not exactly great) fix it up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.230.130 (talk) 12:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Coaster Express/Edit Request 2/28/2016
Could an article for the wooden roller coaster at Parque Warner Madrid Coaster Express be created? . --75.68.122.13 (talk) 19:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Jacob Chesley the Alternate Historian

Tom & Jerry Roller Coaster Name
Even know I already talked about this on the talk page of the Tom & Jerry (roller coaster) article, this is still something I want to talk about here on the main Parque Warner Madrid talk page.

I noticed something while looking up a few articles here on Wikipedia. While the Parque Warner Madrid article in the Cartoon Village section of the article calls it "Tom y Jerry: Picnic en el Parque" (Spanish for "Tom and Jerry: Picnic in the Park"), the main roller coaster article for Tom & Jerry is just named Tom & Jerry (though the article was formerly named "Tom y Jerry (roller coaster)" until 2017 when the article got its present name).

Apparently, according to a website that was linked on the article, the roller coaster is indeed called Tom y Jerry (at least it was in 2005 when the photos on the site were taken) and has a sign that calls the ride "Tom y Jerry: Picnic en el Parque". However, I was told by JlACEer on the Tom & Jerry (roller coaster) talk page that the park official Parque Warner Madrid website has it listed as Tom & Jerry, with the ampersand, in both its original Spanish and translated English (though he might not be correct, I'll check it out later).

It appears that some inconsistences between both articles should probably be corrected. --JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)