Talk:Parsnip/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria A tasty article, full of flavour
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Some of the external links could use access dates. Also, the last one is broken.
 * Done. They all work for me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
 * One "citation required"
 * New source found. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All images are appropriately licensed.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All images are appropriately licensed.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)