Talk:Parsurameswara Temple/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hamiltonstone (talk · contribs) 13:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Generally excellent article. It is neutral, stable, and fairly comprehensive. Images are appropriately licenced. I have copyedited it where i was clear about the intended meaning. Other points:
 * At one point we have "the sanctum, called vimana," and at another "The sanctum (garbhagriha)". It can't be both - something needs fixing.
 * I have removed garbhagriha to make it consistent.


 * "the walls are mottled by portions" - what?? Neither the use of "mottled" nor "portions" makes sense here. Can someone check this out?
 * rephrased


 * Final section has "...prove the existence of Natyasastra tradition during the times." There need to be at least a few words explaining what this tradition is - a wikilink is not sufficient. Also specify during which times.
 * Good point - I had a wrong denotion here - it was Devadasi tradition, whose existence is insisted. I have rephrased the section.

I think that's it. hamiltonstone (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for taking up the review. Let me fix the items quoted.Ssriram mt (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Please let me know for further comments.Ssriram mt (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that's it. Thank you for the prompt responses. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)