Talk:Partial-order planning

Large diff, not sure if some should be reverted
This article was basically rewritten. They have expanded the article but the quality appears to have decreased. Many links are broken and categories are removed. I'm not an expert in the area but some changes seem dubious (chiefly, changing the introduction from an automated planning focus to a brain/cognition focus). It might be useful to merge/revert in some of the earlier content. -Phoglenix (talk) 05:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

I have now merged in the changes from before that large diff -Phoglenix (talk) 07:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

This article is quite outdated in its discussion of the merits of partial order planning vs. total order planning. The latter is considered far superior these days, most notably because the difficulty of generating good heuristics for partial order planning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.142.72.167 (talk) 13:46, 26 June 2017 (UTC)