Talk:Party lines

Rather than being merely cross-referenced to party line, it is ludicrous for this to be a separate article. It is almost like having one article devoted to "tiger" and another to "tigers". I would further suggest the consideration of the political aspects of the article be merged into party discipline, leaving "party line" strictly with strictly the telephonic sense (and, of course, a link). Rlquall 14:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)