Talk:Passbook

Merger proposal
I hereby propose the merger of the article Passbook printers into the article Passbook. The "Passbook printers" article seems minimally notable, and it seems to me that the article does not have a legitimate reason to remain separate. Your input is appreciated. Paradoxsociety (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I just tagged the passbook printers article as copyright violation and reworded the paragraph related to passbook printers, as it read as an advertisement. That should settle it. AirOdyssey (Talk) 01:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching that! When I had originally read the passbook printers article, it didn't even cross my mind that it could have been plagiarized. I'll have to keep a better eye out for that in the future. Paradoxsociety (talk) 00:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Sberkassa
...is/was a bank, not a bankbook. The correct word to refer to the book is "sberknizhka/сберкнижка", but there is no corresponding article in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.83.30.152 (talk) 12:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

mnemonics?
Short codes on passbook should have nothing to do with mnemonics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaefw (talk • contribs) 03:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)