Talk:Passing off

Move request

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

PAGE MOVED per request. -GTBacchus(talk) 23:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Requested move
Passing off (legal term) → Passing off — Put article back where it came from. Article was moved because someone thought that it needed to make way for a disambig page. It later turned out that the other terms were not 'Passing off' but 'Passing', so if the current disambig page was cleaned strictly according to MoS:DP, it would meet WP:SPEEDY. AliceJMarkham 07:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Survey
Add  * Support   or   * Oppose   on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~.
 * Support reason given in request says it all. --AliceJMarkham 07:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Clackmannanshireman 01:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Abstain: This is one of those many occasions where the move should just be done.  No need for a vote.  Paul Beardsell 03:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Discussion
Add any additional comments: I agree with Paul, but was uncertain whether there might be any controversy. I would otherwise have put it into 'uncontroversial moves'. I believe that we can declare consensus. --AliceJMarkham 05:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Worldwide view
"The examples and perspective in this article discusses law in the United Kingdom may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (February 2014)"

Two comments: 1) Although the article references UK law, the bulk of the discussion covers common law in general, and reference is also made to other jurisdictions (NZ, Australia)

2) A high proportion of the legal articles in Wikipedia cover their subject almost exclusively from the basis of US law; but are not given this marking.

Would whoever anonymously made the marking care to justify it? 146.198.220.104 (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree Catobonus (talk) 15:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)