Talk:Pat Seerey/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 13:45, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Article looks pretty stable. I'll review it shortly. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 13:45, 6 October 2014 (UTC) a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
 * Well-written Symbol support vote.svg

b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation


 * The article is excellently written with one or two tiny errors which I have fixed as I read the article through.

a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
 * Verifiable with no original research Symbol support vote.svg

b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

c. It contains no original research
 * The sources used in this article are acceptable and contain the necessary information.

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic
 * Broad in its coverage Symbol support vote.svg

b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
 * The article is very broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.

It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
 * Neutral Symbol support vote.svg
 * The article is neutral and does not included personal opinions or statements.

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
 * Stable Symbol support vote.svg
 * The article is mainly written by one major contributor and the content does not significantly change from day to day (edits made in preparation for the GA-nomination will be ignored). It's also stable no edit wars or disputes.

a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
 * Illustrated Symbol support vote.svg

b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
 * The article is illustrated with one image in the infobox which is uploaded and from Commons and is a public domain.


 * Pass, fail or hold? Symbol support vote.svg
 * This article meets all the GA-requirements and I'm therefore going to pass it. Excellent job. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 14:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)