Talk:Patient participation/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jmh649 (talk · contribs) 21:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

A few comments: Will give you 2 weeks to address this before providing more feedback / a more in depth review. Happy editing.-- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) We typically use recent secondary sources rather than primary sources. This for example is a primary source when more recent secondary sources are available such as
 * 2) Also formatting style needs improvement. Please look at other GAs/FAs for how to do this such as Urinary tract infection.


 * This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Patient participation", which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL. Most likely a very big problem exists, then, wrt WP:RS. Citizendum is a user-contributed site.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 17:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The merits of the content however will be based on the references found here and not on the Citizendium article. Attribution was given. I will see if the nominator replies. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)