Talk:Patrick J. O'Connor

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patrick J. O'Connor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221005343/http://www.elections.state.il.us/ to http://www.elections.state.il.us/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Patrick J. O'Connor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123044414/http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/1363526,CST-NWS-cong06.article to http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/1363526,CST-NWS-cong06.article
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718213202/http://www.elections.state.il.us/CampaignDisclosure/CommitteeDetail.aspx?id=832 to http://www.elections.state.il.us/CampaignDisclosure/CommitteeDetail.aspx?id=832

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Tone, emphasis, and use of Wikipedia's voice
I think the article could use work on overall tone, emphasis, and how Wikipedia's voice is used. --Hipal (talk) 16:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I completely agree. This feels much more like a hit piece then a page of encyclopedic value. This is properly sourced, but it just has a really negative tone. Lectrician2 (talk) 16:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Better references would help. Not that the Chicago Trib isn't reliable (I assume it's being properly used and none of the refs are opinion pieces, primary sources, or other references that would cause BLP problems), but that a more independent source than the local newspaper would help. --Hipal (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I think that caring chicagoan is a fake account, this is his first contribution. Lectrician2 (talk) 21:32, 13 September 2021 (UTC)