Talk:Paul Baxendale-Walker/Archives/2013

Intro: Former lawyer?
Come off it...That could mean anything from he retired, moved on to a new career, stopped working etc? No the fact is he was struck off for breaches of the Law Society's Code of Practice. So why does it now state that clearly in the intro as per the policy of WP:SPADE dictates? Is this page written/protected/controlled by members of Baxendale-Walker's PR team? Considering the size of the article, they must enjoy polishing a turd!!!

He is a struck off solicitor first and foremost NOT a former lawyer. Talk about putting the cart before the horse! 109.151.102.254 (talk) 10:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Old discussion
In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, perhaps User:, or other recent contributors to this article, will make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case.

— triwbe (talk) 18:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Porn?
Why does his involvements with the pornographic film industry not count as valid when it was a $14m investment that has been well documented in the British press of which sources have been supplied? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrunkTomsk (talk • contribs) 13:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * See above. Biographies require impeccable sources, and the sole source you cited did not go anywhere near to satisfying your content. If necessary, the article can be locked until such sources are provided.  Rodhull  andemu  13:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The article was well sourced. I can provide alot more sources if you wish. What is it like working with Paul and him getting you to hide his involvement in the adult industry? You are a lawyer, what is Pauls main profession again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrunkTomsk (talk • contribs) 13:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I suggest you provide such sources, below, and withdraw the allegation that I am acting corruptly to protect someone I neither know nor care for. Otherwise, your editing career here is likely to be a short one. Rodhull  andemu  14:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

http://risingstarpr.com/news/?p=2640 Seems as though Paul Baxendale Walker and Paul Chaplin are one and the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.13.80 (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)


 * This discussion is old, but it seems that this subject's involvement in various parts of the adult industry is at least pretty-well documented. Guy1890 (talk) 00:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)