Talk:Paul Lorenzen

took an early interpretation? instate?
I don't understand this sentence; I can't even parse it:

"Lorenzen took an early interpretation of Steven Weinberg (Gravitation and Cosmology, 1972) for his doubts about geometrical elements of general relativity, believing that Maxwell's equations are to be modified by general relativity instate."

What does it mean to "take an interpretation"? Whose doubts (Lorenzen's or Weinberg's)? What does "instate" mean -- should it be "instead"?

An earlier version was:

"Lorenzen followed Dingler in having doubts about geometrical elements of general relativity, believing that interpretation of Maxwell's equations are to be modified instate."

That suggests the doubts were Lorenzen's; but took an early interpretation? instate? 66.245.43.17 (talk) 23:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Factual problem?
"He created and modified constructive mathematics."

The word "create" is certainly inappropriate, given the many historical precedents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.65.125 (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Lorenzen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060320163246/http://dispatch.opac.ddb.de/DB=4.1/REL?PPN=11857437X to http://dispatch.opac.ddb.de/DB=4.1/REL?PPN=11857437X

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)