Talk:Paul Voermans

Untitled
The following sentence seems ambiguous to me: Without heavy scientific element, this work could be considered slipstream fiction written from the "inside" of the field.

Does it mean that the book lacks any "heavy scientific element" and can therefore be considered slipstream? Or does it mean that the book could have been considered slipstream but for having a heavy scientific element? (I can't remember the book well enough to disambiguate based on my own knowledge of it.) Metamagician3000 14:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Though such memory as I have suggests that the former meaning was intended. Yes? No? Metamagician3000 14:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I preferred the other photo, the Easter 2006 one, but I'm biased I guess. ;) Metamagician3000 06:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Draft:Paul Voermans into Paul Voermans
Draft contains more information than article, and can be used to expand draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)