Talk:Paul Ziert

tags from deb
1. Expansion tag says that sources are given for expansion (but none were given by the tagger). I could kvetch about why adding a tag (at least just put a stub tag at the bottom...stub implies need to tag). But without getting into it, just the template says "Please expand this article. Some suggested sources are given hereafter. More information might be found in a section of the talk page. (March 2013)". No sources where given...and certainly nothing put on talk.

2. The other one...sheesh. If you don't think it is notable, AFD or PROD or SD it. What is the point of a template for non-notability? (either the thing passes and then why deface it...or it fails and we get rid of it).

TCO (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm going to cut the box on notability. If this is dramatic (hope not), we can just take it to AFD.  I figured AFDing something I don't think needs deletion would be more pointy and dramatic than cutting the tag.  But otherwise, how can I ever get rid of the tag if I don't AFD it (and it is a drama to revert the tag).TCO (talk) 21:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)