Talk:Paula method

Future work
I've noticed that high-quality articles for this page have been deleted in favor of a small blurb discrediting the method. Given there is high-quality research to support the method, I am surprised but not shocked. With love, I suggest that we protect this topic and allow it to grow. Ray Solano (talk) 10:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Further, I'll add that in the future this work may be considered some of a health revolution, once it is made accessible to the public. So, I experience further sadness that one researcher who in the past dismissed the theory in favor of their own practice has led to even one person dismissing the quality of this practice (I saw that version of information cited in the old Wikipedia article as a reason to dismiss the work in an Amazon review). What a shame. Oh well :) now – that all may see and be exposed to the healing potential available here. I'd love to be able to give this article more time. Ray Solano (talk) 07:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * See WP:MEDRS and WP:CRYSTAL. DMacks (talk) 07:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

WP:Prod
I've proposed deletion of this article. Feel free to discuss here. Resequent (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I've objected to the prod. While the article in the form you saw was indeed heavily reliant on primary sources and COI, that was all added later, on top of a stub that seemed strictly in compliance with WP:MEDRS (I agree with this comment by an earlier author). I have reverted the article to that form. Feel free to AFD if you think the topic itself is non-viable despite this apparent systematic review ref. DMacks (talk) 07:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)