Talk:Paulo Costa

Requested move 14 August 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

– The other four articles (footballers, writer, composer) all get 0-5 daily views, whereas the fighter has gotten 800-2000 daily views over the past two years alone. The fighter is the primary topic. There should be a hatnote on the fighter's page that links to "For other people named Paulo Costa, click here" Marty2Hotty (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Paulo Costa (fighter) → Paulo Costa
 * Paulo Costa → Paulo Costa (disambiguation)
 * Oppose. No more than WP:RECENTISM. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The goal is to get readers quickly to the article they are looking for, right? Marty2Hotty (talk) 17:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * How is this recentism lol, Costa has been a UFC star for a few years now.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 02:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Support Clear primary topic per |Paulo_Costa_(footballer)|Paulo_Edson_Nasciemento_Costa|Paulo_Costa_Lima|Paulo_da_Costa_(writer) pageviews - the fighter has received orders of magnitude more views than the others combined consistently since 2017. That's not recentism. Lennart97 (talk) 23:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Wow, mind-blowing stats you shared on the pageviews link. 02:06, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nom.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 02:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. With ~1,000 daily page views (maybe down to ~500 on the low end) compared to ~14 on the high end, it seems that this is the clear primary topic.  If this is truly recentism and things change down the line, this can be reassessed then. -2pou (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Misinformation in the controversies section
Delete your garbage website 72.185.157.13 (talk) 06:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)