Talk:Paw, Paw

that would make sense if the dog is given note as having passed away- name the dog grooming studio

Non-Notable Animal. Brief mention in Stewarts page but not own artice. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

How could paw, Paw merge into Martha Stewart? Anymore than Mr. Greenjeans could merge into Captain Kangaroo?

Notability v Fame
Please note these are not the same thing. We are not dealing here with Trigger, Lassie or Rin Tin Tin. In this particular case, this is the dog owned by a famous person, but since notability is not inherited, something more is needed to justify it, and its death, being notable in encyclopedic terms. I declined a speedy deletion because strictly, there is no criterion that covers this article; I would have put a tag on it, but it wouldn't have stayed. The alternative is to send it to articles for deletion, where, to be honest, I doubt it would get through the process. Better to merge into Martha Stewart, even as a separate paragraph, where it has more justification to exist. At present, there is nothing to justify this article standing on its own. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 00:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC) r They said speedy deletion was not necessary that it copuld wait for the merge the merge into martha could be hazardous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.18.63.233 (talk) 00:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC) ]

I intend to note important things paw, paw did

just plain useless
I am the CEO of a major hamburger chain, my gold fish Loretta died after 20 years of loyal service.

I am the Chef of a major resturant chain, my pet duck harold died after 15 years of loyal service.

What next?