Talk:Paw Paws

Name of the article
Rename this to "Paw Paw Bears". The cartoon isn't called "Paw Paws". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.67.16.31 (talk) 14:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The only source cited in the article is the page called . It refers to the show as Paw Paws, not Paw Paw Bears, and it shows a picture of a piece of poster art for the show. The poster art also shows Paw Paws, not Paw Paw Bears. Actually, the poster art seems to be for the film entitled Waif Goodbye to the Paw Paws ( – notice the extra text that is partly cut off in the picture on IMBD – I found a complete picture of the VHS cover art on Amazon.com). I found a video clip on YouTube that shows that the title shown on the screen is Paw Paws, but the show's theme song keeps saying "Paw Paw Bears" over and over. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Not a good reception
I don't think a top list count as an reception since they not a actual review. (mich (talk) 20:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC))
 * We are talking about this part which you deleted entirely:
 * One of many children's animated series of the 1980s, Paw Paws didn't leave a lasting impression on many viewers. In 2014, listing it among twelve 1980s cartoons that did not deserve remembrance, io9 characterized it as "Obviously, Hanna-Barbera was wrong. And kind of racist." 
 * Of course this counts as reception - a critic evaluated this work and included it there based on this evaluation. WP:NPOV doesn't require that notable views have to be expressed in specific layouts or carry specific titles ("review") for them to be included. Regards, HaeB (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Obviously, Rob Bricken was wrong. And kind of stupid.174.89.119.57 (talk) 09:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)