Talk:Paxyl

This article is shameless advertisment
This article needs a huge amount of work. Are usage instructions really necessary? This reads like a quote from the drug company or the back of the bottle. This is also listed as a related topic under burns. Considering the number of other things that could be linked to burns, it makes it clear that this is simple self-promotion. User:Jazradel

This is an advertisement
This page reads as though it has been lifted directly from a package of Paxyl. Please clean it up. I quote: Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, see Wikipedia:Spam. The Wilschon 01:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

This is an important article and further is useful to differentiate it from the anti-depressant drug Paxil. It is important that the two are differentiated, such as if there was someone that was suffering from depression and they got some Paxyl, thinking it was Paxil, and could assist them, then it would not be particularly useful for treating depression. Ajayvius 10:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Drive-by cleanup complete. -- Greentryst TC 13:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

It was certainly not my intent for it to be a promotional article. I am just a long standing and very passionate user of Paxyl. It truly is a wonderful product and worthy of some detailed description. Unfortunately the article has now been totally gutted so I will have to restore it to some semblance of the former glory that the article had obtained.Ajayvius 12:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Please do not. Several users have commented that this article reads as if it were lifted directly from the back of the bottle, or from an advertisement.  Please stick to professional quality writing styles, and please abide by the wikipedia guidelines.  Please do not change titles of sections on the talk page.  I began this section, intending to initiate a discussion of how the article might be fixed, not to praise the article.  Changing the section will stifle the discussion by confusing people.  Also, since my post is the first under the section title, it looks as though "This is a very good article" were my words, which they emphatically are not, as I do not think that an advertisement constitutes a good article at all. The Wilschon 02:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Ouch! Ajayvius 05:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)