Talk:Peace be upon him (Judaism)

BS"D

Just out of curiosity, why is this page so inspecific???? --Shaul avrom 12:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Check Talk:Peace be upon him in Islam, which used to be Peace be upon him (an Islamic-only article). I turned Peace be upon him into a mixed article which caused some objections and then I just changed it all and made Peace be upon him a disambig and we have this page and Peace be upon him in Islam from there. About the article, if you can add anything, go ahead. :) --Daniel575 | (talk) 20:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I think this is silly. The phrases are probably related. No reason to view them in isolation. It detracts. --Meshulam 12:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * There is one honorific missing. Zichrono Tzodik v'koidesh livrochoh. TZVK"L --Shaul avrom

"Is On" vs "Be Upon"
The distinction between a "matter of fact statement" and an expression of wishes is either incorrect or just another interpretation&mdash;since the "matter of fact statement" would require faith in specific things that happen after death. To most people, it is understood as a mostly wishful expression.

(I will not discuss what is "most" here. Should anybody wish to argue that, consider the point conceded.)

I am not reverting again, but to the last editor: please be advised to respect thy fellow editor. They may know what they're talking about. elpincha 01:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)