Talk:Pear Deck

After searching, I see that Pear Deck is a notable piece of software. Please fill in a stub's worth of information, and a few sources to avoid deletion. super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 19:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Note that I've move User:Rubychili2005's article Peardeck here. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 20:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * While short, I don't think this article meets Speedy A7, because: "Any statement which plausibly indicates that additional research (possibly offline, possibly in specialized sources) has a reasonable chance of demonstrating notability is a claim of significance." A simple G-Search shows this is not the case. I think a Prod, or AfD would be more appropriate, if the author fails to expand and source. super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat  21:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

AfD

 * Does not fit WP:NOTABILITY and should be deleted. 209.82.165.136 (talk) 18:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)