Talk:Pedagogical agent/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

I'll complete this within a day JAG  UAR   16:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm so sorry to do this, but I have no choice but to quickfail this article (also the first time out of my 290 reviews I've done so). Per WP:QUICKFAIL, this is currently a long way off from meeting the GA criteria. I'll list most of the concerns below:


 * Per WP:LEADCITE, citations are discouraged in the lead unless it's citing controversial information. In this case, it doesn't appear so
 * The lead needs to be expanded and split into at least two paragraphs in order to summarise
 * "Mabanza and de Wet" - who is de Wet?
 * " “A tutor agent plays the role of a teacher, while a co-learner agent plays the role of a learning companion"" - where did this quote come from?
 * Headers should not be linked, per WP:MOS
 * The example section shouldn't be in this article, it contains barely any prose and a large image. I'm afraid it's not encyclopaedic
 * The External Articles and Websites section is messed up. Also, it should be renamed "External links"

It does appear well researched, but glaring MOS issues prevent this from meeting the GA criteria. Please feel free to renominate once everything is addressed, I'll be more than happy to take another look. Regards  JAG  UAR   17:14, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. It's very informative and greatly appreciated. We will be looking to apply the edits you suggested and to strengthen the article. PWNT892 (talk) 02:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)