Talk:Pedagogy 3.0

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... I am new to Wiki writing and I do not fully understand your conventions. So, please explain where this article goes wrong and I will alter it accordingly. It is written by a group of academics exploring the future of pedagogy in a web 3.0 world. The term 'Pedagogy 3.0' is increasingly being used on the web (eg http://www.guide2digitallearning.com/blog_jim_vanides/pedagogy_3_0_re_imagining_stem_teacher_preparation) and we wanted to define it and place in the context of traditional views of pedagogy. Thus, the article is, in the view of my collaborators, both balanced and fair. Hewlett Packard are acting as a catalyst for this work and do not benefit directly from this research. Thus, there are no financial benefits accrued. Best wishes  Neil Ingram Bristol (talk) 12:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC) --Neil Ingram Bristol (talk) 12:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)