Talk:Pediculicide

Unbalanced. The article contains sections that make sweeping statements without supporting references to primary sources. (citations needed to review articles and to pediculicide research) The author clearly understands the general topic and how to use specific citations. article calls out specific products (ephemera) and discusses their advantages over unnamed competitors (commercial bias).

The author does write clearly.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pediculicide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.gvfi.org/Wolf_pubs/43_Pollack_1999.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100403024049/http://www.oystershell.be/silcap.htm to http://www.oystershell.be/silcap.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100403024049/http://www.oystershell.be/silcap.htm to http://www.oystershell.be/silcap.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141229034101/http://www.vintagegarage.co.uk/histories/carless%20capel%20%26%20leonard.htm to http://www.vintagegarage.co.uk/histories/carless%20capel%20%26%20leonard.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)